Thursday, August 6, 2015

Sarcasm on Parshat Korach

:Parshat Korach  begins as follows

וַיִּקַּח קֹרַח, בֶּן-יִצְהָר בֶּן-קְהָת בֶּן-לֵוִי; וְדָתָן וַאֲבִירָם בְּנֵי אֱלִיאָב, וְאוֹן בֶּן-פֶּלֶת--בְּנֵי רְאוּבֵן.

And so took Korach son of Yitzhar son of Kehat son of Levi; and Datan and Aviram sons of Eliav, and Oen son of Pelet, sons Re'uven.

What did they take? In all the rest of Tanach, The word 'Vayikach' always has a clear object, the person taking, and a clear subject, the thing being taken. Here, the Torah only tells us who took!

I conjecture that they, in fact, took themselves. The language the Torah uses thus indicates that they took themselves – and from where? They took themselves out of the congregation of Bnei Yisrael.

Rav Hirsch on this parsha notes that 'taking', by its very nature, is also to make separate. I note that the words of separating in ancient Hebrew grow from the root word Kuf Daled Shin - Kadesh.

When Korach says to Moshe & Aharon:
'hashem - רַב-לָכֶם--כִּי כָל-הָעֵדָה כֻּלָּם קְדֹשִׁים, וּבְתוֹכָם יְהוָה; וּמַדּוּעַ תִּתְנַשְּׂאוּ, עַל-קְהַל'

Korach is employing sarcasm - he is insinuating that his Kahal – the Kahal that just constituted itself against Moshe and Aharon - is, by merit of having declared themselves separated to be leaders, more able and more worthy of leadership of Bnei Yisrael than Moshe – after all, Moshe was chosen by God, but Moshe was a reluctant leader - he only led because he had to. Korach is saying: Hey! Moshe - Good News - you can step down now, we got this under control! You don’t have to carry this burden anymore. It sounds pretty good, without the retrospect…


The adage that "Those who most seek power are those least fit to wield it" is indicated to be correct in God's eyes by His response to Korach’s Kahal’s Kedusha-claim. Or maybe, He simply dislikes sarcastic politicians!

Symbolism of the Rainbow

While walking to shul this past on a recent erev Shabbat, the one upon which the 9th of Av fell this year, I saw a faint rainbow in the clouds. This led to some mind-wandering on my walk, which ended with me pondering the following question:

Why is the rainbow the symbol of the covenant between God and Noach in the 9th Perek of Bereishet:

יב: וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹקים, זֹאת אוֹת-הַבְּרִית אֲשֶׁר-אֲנִי נֹתֵן בֵּינִי וּבֵינֵיכֶם, וּבֵין כָּל-נֶפֶשׁ חַיָּה, אֲשֶׁר אִתְּדֶ--לְדֹרֹת, עוֹלָם
12: And God said: 'This is the token of the covenant which I make between Me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations
...
טז: וְהָיְתָה הַקֶּשֶׁת, בֶּעָנָן; וּרְאִיתִיהָ, לִזְכֹּר בְּרִית עוֹלָם, בֵּין אֱלֹקים, וּבֵין כָּל-נֶפֶשׁ חַיָּה בְּכָל-בָּשָׂר אֲשֶׁר עַל-הָאָרֶץ
16: And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth:

Why is the rainbow chosen as the symbol of this covenant? Why not a torrential downpour? A terrible storm? A dove? A large boat? Why specifically a rainbow?

I propose the following:

The generation of the flood committed many sins - of violence and thievery and so on. Their sins were rooted in Sinat Chinam (Bereishit Rabbah 38:6) - in 'free' hatred (I will discuss that concept further in a future post).

What is one, if not the, root cause of Sinat Chinam? When one sees other people as completely separate from oneself - when any difference from oneself in another makes one's fellow an 'other' - a non-person.

A rainbow, to the human eye, looks like it is made of several distinct and separate bands of color. In reality, the color changes continuously*, without borders, along the width of the rainbow.

This is the symbol for Man - that we should look upon the rainbow, and perceive the symbol, to remember that as different as we may be from one-another there is no wall between us, there is no division that brings forth such a differentiation as between 'person' and 'other' - and when this is abrogated, Mankind once more walks the path of destruction.

May we all endeavor to bring forth, and merit to see, the day when all of humanity will hold this principle in their minds, and teach it to their children, inductively, for all time.


*For the mathematically inclined:
I note that in reality this is not quite true according to a mathematically rigorous usage of continuity, at least in the typical sense with which it is applied in analysis, due the the fundamental graininess of the universe on the smallest scale. I do not think that this negates the nice symbolism, and one can read not 'continuously' but rather 'without borders or sudden changes' if so desired.